The Uniform Power of Attorney Act
January 30, 2009
The Virginia General Assembly is currently reviewing legislation, which, if signed into law, will have a significant impact on laws related to the use and acceptance of durable powers of attorney (“DPA”). The Uniform Power of Attorney Act, (“UPOAA”) was introduced into the January 2009 legislative session in an effort to bring uniformity to an area of law that has been rapidly emerging as a significant, if not vital, estate planning tool.
A DPA is legal document that grants authority to an agent to act on behalf of the principal, and provides for the continuation of that authority in the event the principal suffers a subsequent disability or incapacity. As the popularity of DPAs continues to increase, so has litigation related to their use. Unlike guardianships and conservatorships, DPAs require little to no oversight. Therefore, financial exploitation by unscrupulous agents is a widespread problem.
DPAs are governed by state law, and those laws vary substantially. In 2002, the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (“NCCUSL”) conducted a survey comparing state DPA statutes. The study revealed many issues related to DPAs that needed to be addressed, including (1) improving portability, (2) including safeguards, remedies, and sanctions for abuse by an agent, (3) protecting the reliance of third parties on a DPA, and (4) providing remedies and sanctions for a third party’s refusal to honor a DPA.
As a result of this survey, in 2006 the NCCUSL adopted and promulgated the UPOAA. The UPOAA is an endeavor by the NCCUSL to “codify both state legislative trends and collective best practices, and strike a balance between the need for flexibility and acceptance of an agent’s authority by third parties and the need to prevent and redress financial abuse.” The UPOAA seeks to preserve DPAs as a low-cost, flexible, and private form of surrogate decision making while at the same time attempting to prevent and redress financial abuse of incapacitated individuals. The UPOAA is basically a set of default rules that preserve a principal’s freedom to choose both the extent of the agent’s authority and the rules that govern the agent’s conduct.
Shortly after the UPOAA was developed, the Trust and Estate Section of the Virginia Bar Association formed a sub-committee, chaired by Oast & Hook attorney Andrew H. Hook, whose task it was to study the UPOAA and assess the impact that its enactment in Virginia would have on current Virginia law. The sub-committee met regularly to discuss the UPOAA and made revisions to the Act where it thought that Virginia law was superior. This sub-committee also consulted with various organizations, such as the Virginia Bankers Association and the AARP, to solicit feedback on the UPOAA. In the fall of 2008, the sub-committee recommended the UPOAA bill to the Virginia General Assembly for enactment.
As of the date of this article, the UPOAA bill has made its way through the Virginia Senate Courts of Justice Committee, and the bill is expected to be voted on by the full Senate within the next few weeks. If the Senate approves the bill, then it will cross over into the House of Delegates for its review and vote. The bill is not expected to receive any opposition. If the General Assembly enacts the UPOAA, then it will bring much needed certainty to Virginia law related to DPAs. The enactment of the UPOAA will also provide greater protections for third parties at a time when a dramatically increasing amount of the nation’s wealth is being managed under DPAs because of the aging of the baby boomer generation. Current Virginia law is inadequate to meet those needs.
Since its inception in 2006, the UPOAA has been enacted by two states, New Mexico and Idaho. In 2008, however, bills were presented to the state legislatures in Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan and Mississippi. These states are carefully studying the UPOAA and assessing the impact its enactment will have on their various constituencies.
For more information on the UPOAA, visit www.nccusl.com.
Lisa Johnson is an elder law attorney with Oast & Hook. She concentrates her practice in the area of estate planning.
O&Hook: Allie, we understand you’ve heard a great story about a woman helping stray cats. Please tell us about her.
Allie: I’d be happy to. In 1972, a young woman named Jane DeMartino survived an airplane crash that left her a paraplegic. For years, she lived in the Boston area with her rescued cat named Molly. In the early 1980s, she saw a beautiful feral cat with five kittens, and she knew that she must help them. She saved those cats, and over the years she and the children in her apartment complex trapped other feral cats, had them spayed or neutered, and found homes for them. Over time, from her wheelchair, she helped save several colonies of feral cats, as well as abused, pregnant and injured strays.
Ms. DeMartino’s siblings bought her a house in Schenectady, New York, where she has continued her remarkable work with feral and stray cats. The American Red Cross recognized Ms. DeMartino’s work in 2004 when it presented her with the Hometown Heroes Award for pet rescue. Ms. DeMartino and Bill and Tricia Stallings established a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization called Caring About the Strays (C.A.T.S.). The organization helps 30 to 40 cats daily, and it saves more than 100 cats annually. For more information on this inspirational friend to felines, please visit Ms. DeMartino’s website at www.all-creatures.org/cats/index.html. Many thanks to Ms. DeMartino and to all of those who help stray and feral cats, like my family at Oast & Hook who helped me.
Distribution of This Newsletter
Oast & Hook encourages you to share this newsletter with anyone who is interested in issues pertaining to the elderly, the disabled and their advocates. The information in this newsletter may be copied and distributed, without charge and without permission, but with appropriate citation to Oast & Hook, P.C. If you are interested in a free subscription to the Oast & Hook News, then please e-mail us at firstname.lastname@example.org , telephone us at 757-399-7506, or fax us at 757-397-1267.
This newsletter is not intended as a substitute for legal counsel. While every precaution has been taken to make this newsletter accurate, we assume no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages resulting from the use of the information in this newsletter.