Comprehensive Planning. Lifelong Solutions.

What is the difference between a Living Will and a “Do Not Resuscitate” Order?

By Emily Martin, Esq.

When we meet with clients, one issue that comes up often is end-of-life care. While it’s certainly an unpleasant thought, it is important to face the possibility that you may become unable to make decisions about your healthcare at some point. Whether you suffer from dementia and gradually become incapacitated or you experience a stroke or terrible accident and the change is more sudden, if you cannot make decisions yourself, someone is going to have to take on that responsibility for you. Perhaps most importantly, whoever is making these decisions for you will need guidance on what your wishes would be in certain situations. For example, if you were in a terminal state with no hope of recovery, would you want to be kept alive artificially through assisted respiration, feeding tubes, and other mechanisms? If so, how long would you want to be kept alive?

Many people confuse the terms “Living Will” and a “Do Not Resuscitate” Order (commonly called a DNR). A Living Will is simply a statement of your wishes. In this document, you can state whether you would like to have life-prolonging procedures such as artificial nutrition and hydration continued if you were in a vegetative state with no hope of recovery. You can also state whether you prefer to be buried or cremated and give direction as to whether you would like your body or organs to be donated for either scientific or medical purposes. This document works with your healthcare power of attorney – your agent under that document must follow your wishes as laid out in the advance medical directive.

On the other hand, a DNR is a written physician’s order to withhold resuscitation from a patient in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Resuscitation measures that can be withheld under a DNR Order include cardiac compression, intubation, artificial ventilation, defibrillation, and other related procedures (Virginia Code § 54.1-2982).  Instructions to implement a DNR order are typically given by whoever is legally permitted to make medical decisions on behalf of a patient in the hospital – whether that person is the next of kin as defined by Virginia law or is someone appointed under a Healthcare Power of Attorney.

While Living Wills typically remain in effect until the person who implemented it passes away or executes a new one, DNR orders typically are revoked if a patient makes a full recovery and leaves the hospital. That means that a new DNR would need to be implemented if there were another hospitalization.

Another important document that is related to both Living Wills and DNR Orders is the Healthcare Power of Attorney. This document allows you to appoint one or more people who will work with your doctors to make healthcare decisions on your behalf should you become incapacitated. An agent under a healthcare power of attorney has a variety of powers and responsibilities, including the ability to decide which course of treatment is best for you, whether you should enter a long-term care facility, and which doctors should be consulted as to your care. If you have a Healthcare Power of Attorney, your agent will be the one who decides whether to instruct the doctor to issue a DNR Order or not.

If you don’t have a Healthcare Power of Attorney, Virginia law provides for a list of priority “surrogate decision-makers.” First on the list is your guardian (if one has been appointed), then your spouse, then any adult children you may have (Virginia Code § 54.12986).  Often, this list does not align with whom many people would want making medical decisions for them if they became incapacitated.

Although no one enjoys facing the possibility that they may become incapacitated, it is important that you make your wishes known. Doing so cannot only provide reassurance to your family, because they know what your wishes are; but, it can also guarantee you have a voice in deciding who should make medical decisions for you in the event that you cannot make them on your own.

Ask Kit Kat: Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show which was held last week in New York City?

Kit Kat: Well, it’s a wonderful competition that has been held 142 times! This year’s opened on Feb.11, 2019. The first Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show opened in 1877 at Gilmore’s Garden, which later became known as Madison Square Garden. The show has grown over the years from 1,200 dogs to nearly 3,000 dogs from all 50 states. Originally, a 3-to4-day competition, it is now completed in 2 days. The name “Westminster” was chosen by its founding group as a tribute to their favorite hotel and bar—the Westminster Hotel near Union Square. Though the hotel is long gone, it still lives on in the name of the dog show. The dog show in its early days focused on hunting dogs. Other than the Kentucky Derby, it is the second-oldest continuously run sporting event in the United States. This year marks the 70th year that the event has been televised.

Not many know that the Westminster Dog Show has a junior division for dog handlers who are between the ages of 9-18. It is known as the Junior Showmanship competition. The kids themselves are evaluated, perhaps more so, than their dogs. They have to work as a team. One girl, Rylie May of Hillsboro, Kansas, is now 18, but in her first competition at a 4 H show at age 9, she competed with a 6-month old puppy, who dragged her everywhere. She’s learned a lot since then. May entered her Australian shepherd this year. They didn’t get to the finals, but she was really proud of her dog, Toby. She said, “It’s taught me a lot about responsibility. It’s a lot of hard work. It’s putting the dog’s needs before your own.” (Claudio E. Cabrera, “How the Westminster Dog Show Got Its Name,” The New York Times, Feb.12, 2019/Amy Wang,”At this Westminster Dog Show competition, it’s the humans who are judged, ”The Washington Post, Feb.11, 2019)

Posted on Monday, February 18th, 2019. Filed under Senior Law News.

Protecting a Spouse Remaining in the Community

By Letha Sgritta McDowell, CELA

When one spouse is facing a long-term care need, the initial focus is on the health needs of the spouse who will need long-term care (the “institutionalized spouse” or “IS“); yet, once the care needs have been determined and placement or home care is secured, then the focus necessarily turns towards the needs of the spouse who does not need care (the “community spouse” or “CS”).  Without planning or education, it is possible for all funds, including income and savings, to be expended on the institutionalized spouse, leaving the community spouse with little or nothing.

For individuals needing long-term care, there are a number of ways to pay for care, all of which should be considered when facing such a large expense.  Should one spouse need nursing care for a long period of time, then it is wise to consider Medicaid as an option to assist in paying for care.  Many have misconceptions about the Medicaid program, and there are numerous myths about Medicaid and nursing care. The realty for many is that Medicaid payment of nursing care expenses is the only way that both an institutionalized spouse and a community spouse can be cared for both physically and financially.  Most importantly for married couples, federal Medicaid policy takes the needs of a spouse into account and offers financial protections specifically for the community spouse.

There are a number of requirements for Medicaid eligibility but of most concern is the “income” and “asset” requirements. Practically speaking, income is considered to be amounts paid regularly to the applicant, such as social security, retirement pensions, or annuity payments.  While the definition of income can be much more complex than described here, generally, so long as the applicant’s monthly income is less than the private pay rate of the nursing facility, then the applicant meets the income requirement for Medicaid.  If the individual takes advantage of Medicaid’s home and community-based waiver services, then the income in Virginia is $2,313 and North Carolina is $1,012.  Note that, for purposes of eligibility, only the income of the spouse applying for benefits is relevant.  Therefore, if the spouse remaining in the community has income which exceeds either the private pay rate of the nursing facility or the above waiver limits, then the applicant still meets the income requirements.  Unfortunately, often it is the institutionalized spouse who has the greater income.  While the community spouse’s income is not considered for eligibility, it is considered when looking at what the institutionalized spouse may need to contribute towards his or her cost of care.  Federal Medicaid policy requires that each state create a Minimum Monthly Maintenance Needs Allowance (“MMMNA”) and, if the community spouse’s income falls below the MMMNA amount, then the institutionalized spouse will be directed to contribute an amount from his or her income to the community spouse in order to provide that the community spouse has income of at least the MMMNA. In addition, there are circumstances in which an even greater contribution from the institutionalized spouse may be allowed if the community spouse can demonstrate a need.  Currently the MMMNA for Virginia is $2,057.50 and North Carolina is $2,058.

Even more concerning than monthly income, is often what happens to a couple’s assets (“assets”) if one spouse has a long-term nursing care need.  As with income, federal Medicaid policy includes protections for a couple’s assets, ensuring that the spouse remaining in the community may continue to have assets to use for his/her needs. Unlike with the income requirement for eligibility, Medicaid policy does consider the assets of both spouses for eligibility purposes. However, there are two key factors which protect the community spouse.  The first is that certain assets are excluded when reviewing eligibility requirements; essentially, some assets just don’t count. A prime example and of great importance is the couple’s primary residence.  Examples of other assets which don’t count are funerals or burial arrangements, the value of one vehicle, term life insurance, certain annuity contracts, certain loan arrangements, and more.    In addition to allowing certain assets to not count, the community spouse is allowed to keep a percentage of the couple’s combined countable assets up to a maximum of $126,420 (the same in both Virginia and North Carolina).  There was some concern toward the end of last year that this CSRA allowance would no longer apply to home and community-based services; however, Congress has agreed to continue to make allowances for the CSRA even in a home setting.  This amount is known as the Community Spouse Resource Allowance (“CSRA”). Therefore, Medicaid policy allows a community spouse to continue to maintain countable assets up to the CSRA in addition to an unlimited amount of non-countable assets. 

Thus, a community spouse can be financially protected, even if  his/her spouse needs nursing care. Unfortunately, many couples fear financial ruin of chronic illness and have considered drastic measures such as gifting away their property or getting a divorce; or, they mistakenly think that this type of planning needs to be done five years before nursing home placement .  However, this advance planning is not necessary, and no such extreme measures are required to protect a spouse remaining in the community.

Ask Kit Kat: Orca Calf in Northwest

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about the newest orca calf born in the Pacific Northwest?

Kit Kat: Well, this is very good news indeed!  A new orca calf was spotted in mid-January 2019 in Admiralty Inlet, at the north end of Puget Sound. Observers are not sure whether it’s male or female, but it belongs to the L pod, and will be known as L124 for now. At the time of sighting, it appeared to be about 3 weeks old. No calves born to this pod have survived to adulthood since 2015, so everyone is hoping for the best. The L pod has shrunk to 35 in number.  A decline in the Chinook salmon population, its main food source, appears to be the reason for the decline, as well as water pollution. Other groupings of orcas who do not live so close to industrialized areas are faring better.

L pod, along with J and K pods, comprise a group known as the Southern Residents. In its heyday, the Southern Residents numbered about 100. Today, there are approximately 75. J pod became famous last year, when one of its calves died shortly after birth and her distraught mother, J35, pushed her corpse around for 17 days using her nose, before letting her go. J35 may soon lose her mother, J17, who appears to be hungry and weak, according to Melisa Pinnow, a biologist with the Center for Whale Research, which is based in Washington State. Orcas must swim to feed and survive. When they can no longer do that, they die. The Southern Residents are organized around the females. Grandmothers live with their daughters and help young mothers raise their calves. Older females even go through menopause like humans do.

Washington State established a task force last year to look at what could be done to help the orcas. Among the recommendations were 1) to remove certain dams to let rivers take their natural course, 2) to remove net pens of farmed salmon, and 3) to cut back on salmon  consumption, generally. Time will tell whether these recommendations will have a positive impact. (Jacey Fortin, “Orca Cal Offers Hope for a Fading Group in the Pacific Northwest,” The New York Times, Jan. 17, 2019)

Posted on Thursday, February 7th, 2019. Filed under Senior Law News.

The Dangers of Doing it Yourself

By Sarah Schmidt, Esq.

Due in large part to the ever informative Google search bar, estate planning attorneys often see clients who undertake to draft or revise their own estate planning documents  (or leave written instructions to their executor) in an effort to save a few dollars on attorneys’ fees. While it is true that a holographic (i.e., handwritten) will can be a valid will admitted to probate in the Commonwealth of Virginia, there are far too many instances in which handwritten notes—regardless of the writer’s intention—cause more harm than good.  Indeed, a simple codicil (an amendment to a will) or an entirely new will can cost ten times less than what it would cost to petition the court to have the note declared a will or an amendment to a testator’s will after death.

For example, imagine your father passed away and you find two documents in his safety deposit box. First, a simple will leaving everything to his “descendants.” Second, a handwritten note which states, “I wish to remove Sam named as my son entirely from this will—no benefits.” The note is initialed and dated after the date of the will. So what is an executor to do? Does Sam receive anything from the estate? The problem is now that your father has passed away, one can only look to the evidence to attempt to determine whether he intended to modify his will or whether he was simply leaving a handwritten note.

Unfortunately, absent a private agreement amongst beneficiaries, there is only one way to find out—submit the writing to the court and argue your position. Indeed, a note which was very similar was submitted to the Chesapeake Circuit Court probate clerk for probate. The clerk found that the handwritten note was not a validly executed codicil, and the executor of the estate appealed the clerk’s order to the Circuit Court where litigation ensued. The case was ultimately appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia. The Supreme Court held that the records supported the Circuit Court’s ruling that the writing was not a codicil, nor intended to be a codicil. See Irving v. DiVito, 294 Va. 465 (2017).  Regardless of whether the decedent intended the writing to be a codicil or just a handwritten note, there is absolutely no question that the litigation over the writing cost a significant amount more than a new will or codicil would have cost.

Whatever you do, do not write on your estate planning documents and do not leave handwritten notes without consulting with your attorney. When in doubt, always seek the advice of your attorney.

Ask Kit Kat: Victories for Animals

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about the latest victories that animals have won recently to protect their rights?

Kit Kat: Well, this is indeed something to shout about! The two most notable were in California and Florida. Florida I have already talked about in a previous article. Greyhound racing will finally come to an end there in 2020 when dog racing is no longer required at racetracks to keep gambling open. Florida has 11 of the United States’ remaining 17 greyhound tracks. The remaining 6 are not likely to survive on such a small scale.

Which brings us to the victory in California. This is truly something to celebrate, because California is such a large state that its decisions affect a large audience. With the world’s 5th largest economy, this change in culture is bound to have a huge impact. On Nov. 6, 2018, 62% of the voting public approved a measure called Proposition 12 making it illegal to sell eggs, pork, and veal from any farm which cages baby calves, pigs nursing piglets, and hens which are producing eggs. The so-called factory farms have been dealt a huge blow.  This means, that any products raised in California, which treat baby animals inhumanely, will not be allowed to be marketed in California.  This is extremely important, because California tends to be a trendsetter, and it has such a huge population. The egg and meat industries were against Proposition 12, but the Humane Society of the US and other groups lent their support, and they triumphed! (Karen E. Lange, “Voters demand landmark changes for animals,” All Animals, January/February 2019, p. 10-11)

Posted on Wednesday, January 30th, 2019. Filed under Senior Law News.

Estate Planning After Tax Reform

By Jennifer Rossettini, CFP®

It has been a little over a year since the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. Although many of us do not yet know how the changes will affect our personal income tax returns this year, there is some certainty as to how estate planning and estate taxes are affected – at least until 2026, when the new and higher estate tax exemption will revert to 2017 levels. For now, the estate and gift tax exemption is $11.4 Million per individual. This means that a person can gift or bequeath up to $11.4 Million without incurring an estate or gift tax. What did not change with the Act are the rules involving income tax basis for gifts and inherited property. What this means is that the donor of a lifetime gift of an asset also transfers their tax basis in that asset to the donee. On the other hand, a decedent’s gift at death causes the basis to be stepped up (or down) in the hands of the heirs to the fair market value as of the date of death. Although roughly 99 percent of Americans will not owe a transfer tax, careful planning is needed to ensure their loved ones do not incur significant income taxes when they sell property they receive as a gift or inheritance. Careful planning, or planning changes, could also be needed to unwind some of the estate tax planning techniques that were written into older estate plans.

For example, many estate plans for married couples drafted before 2010, when the federal estate and gift tax exemption ranged from $600,000 in 1997 to $3.5 Million in 2009, included provisions for the creation of a “credit shelter trust” (sometimes referred to as “family trusts” or “bypass trusts”) upon the first spouse’s death. In order to preserve the first spouse’s exemption, the first $600,000, for example, of the deceased’s spouse’s $2 Million estate funded the credit shelter trust, and the balance of $1.4 Million passed to the surviving spouse. In 2019, that same $2 Million estate would pass entirely to the credit shelter trust, leaving nothing within the control of the surviving spouse. Not only that, but property held in credit shelter trusts generally does not receive a stepped-up basis when the surviving spouse dies. This will likely cause the descendants to have to pay income tax on capital gains from the subsequent sale of assets.

Although there are some good non-tax reasons for having a credit shelter trust in place, it is worth the effort to have older estate plans reviewed to make sure this approach still meets your needs. If the first spouse has already passed away and you find yourself with a funded credit shelter trust, there are some options for unwinding the otherwise irrevocable credit shelter trust. For example, depending on the terms of the Will or Trust giving rise to the credit shelter trust and the intent of the deceased spouse, the credit shelter trust can be rescinded as long as all of the beneficiaries of that trust agree and/or a court order is obtained.

As with any significant changes in the law or in life, it is important to dust off that estate planning binder and have your documents reviewed by an experienced estate planning attorney.

Ask Kit Kat: Boy and Dog Reunited

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about the boy from North Carolina who has cancer, is now in Utah for treatment, and was reunited with his dog recently?

Kit Kat: Well, this is a feel-good story, if I ever heard one! Perryn Miller is an 8-year old boy from North Carolina who was visiting family in Salt Lake City, Utah over the holidays. While in Utah, Perryn experienced some extreme headaches. After a trip to the emergency room, it was discovered that Perryn was suffering from stage 4 glioblastoma, an advanced form of brain cancer. He had surgery right away, but the family has chosen to stay in Utah for more treatment. All was going well there, but Perryn was heartsick about not having his 8-month old German shepherd named Frank with him. His grandmother who lives in Spotsylvania County, VA, which is south of Fredericksburg, VA, sought help on Facebook about the logistics of transporting Frank to Utah, so Perryn and Frank could be together.

To the rescue came Bob Reynolds of Ladysmith, VA. He didn’t know the Miller family, but he wanted to help. Bob’s working history had included being a long-haul truck driver and a summertime ranger at Yellowstone National Park. The thought of a long distance trip did not daunt him. So he set out on Jan. 3, 2019 at 4:30 AM from Ladysmith and arrived in NC at 10 AM to pick up the dog Frank. 52 hours later (Jan.5), they had made it all the way to Salt Lake City! Bob said Frank was the perfect rider. He played with his toys or napped, and if he had to go to the bathroom, he’s nudge Bob’s right arm. When the duo drove into the driveway of the home where Perryn and his family were staying in Utah, Frank walked right up to the front door, like he’d been there hundreds of times. When the Millers opened the door, Frank “just went crazy,” according to Bob. Bob has even volunteered to take Frank back home, when the time comes they feel they can return to North Carolina. Stay tuned to this developing story. (Adele Uphaus-Conner, “Man reunites dog with boy sighting cancer,” The Free Lance-Star as printed in The Virginian-Pilot, Jan.21, 2019 p,3)

Posted on Thursday, January 24th, 2019. Filed under Senior Law News.

Should I Have a Will or a Trust?

By Shannon Laymon-Pecoraro, Esq.

Many clients come into the office with a preconceived determination of which estate planning documents they need. Some clients believe their plan is overly simple or that they have too few assets to consider a trust (or any estate planning tool for that matter). Other clients enter our offices having heard that they “must have a trust.” It is important to understand, however, that selecting the correct estate planning tool depends on each individual’s unique situation, and there is no one size fits all solution. Understanding the pros and cons of each document allows the client to determine which tool should be used.

The most common reason clients utilize a trust is to avoid probate. In Virginia, probate assets are those assets that fall into the estate and are controlled by the terms of a will or the laws of intestate succession. In simple terms, the assets that fall into a probate estate are those assets held by an individual at the time of their death that do not pass automatically to another person or entity at death.

When probate is necessary, basic costs of administration include recordation costs and probate tax (which are $1.33 per $1,000 worth of probate assets) charged by the court, costs of any necessary surety bonds, and the costs charged by the Commissioner of Accounts to review necessary filings.  As the value of the estate increases, so do the costs of administration. Many clients, as a result, desire to avoid probate to the greatest extent possible.

Attorneys often use inter vivos trusts (most commonly a Revocable Living Trust) to avoid probate. The most important part of the trust, however, is not the document, but funding. It is critical that after a trust is established that assets be retitled into the name of the trust or that the trust be designated as a beneficiary of the assets held in an individual’s name. How you accomplish such funding can be complicated, particularly when retirement accounts are involved. In the event funding does not occur, the asset will fall into the estate, and, as a result, attorneys often drafts wills that pass assets from the estate to a trust.Clients will also use a trust when control over assets would be beneficial. While some clients may desire control to ensure disposition of assets pass through the bloodline without interference, trusts are even more critical when there is a complex family situation. These complex situations often include blended families, family members with disabilities, or creditor issues.

If a client’s dispositive provisions and family situation are simple, a trust may not be necessary to avoid probate. Instead, an attorney may recommend updating deeds to provide transfers at death, holding assets with rights of survivorship, or completing beneficiary designations. With this approach, the assets will pass to the intended recipient outside of probate and a will is utilized as a fail-safe in the event an asset is not effectively transferred after the owner has passed.

Everyone, regardless of the size of his or her estate, should have an estate plan that provides for surrogate-decision making authority during lifetime (think Power of Attorney and Advance Medical Directive) and disposition of assets at death. To discuss which estate planning tools may be right for you and your family, contact the attorneys at Hook Law Center.

Ask Kit Kat: Repeal of Put Bull Ban in Missouri

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about Springfield, Missouri where the citizens recently overturned a ban of owning pit bulls or pit bull-mixes?

Kit Kat: Well, this is very interesting and sad at the same time. Pit bulls are not inherently vicious or aggressive dogs, but they have gained a reputation for being so, because many of them have been bred to engage in dog fighting as a sport or for profit. In October 2017, the city council of Springfield, Missouri by a slim majority had enacted a ban on anyone owning the breed. It was an unusual law in that the punishment for violating the law could be seizure of the dog and euthanasia. In less than a year (August 2018), this unjust law, was put on the ballot as one of many issues during the city election cycle. Breed-specific legislation (BSL) seeks to treat particular breeds of animals differently than others in their class. Unfortunately, this is not the only case of BSL in the country.

 It was a great day for pit bulls when the ban on owning pit bulls or pit bull-mixes was overturned by a whopping 68% of the town’s citizens. “This victory is the result of the  tireless efforts of a coalition of local advocates who took action to put this question on the ballot and give voters the opportunity to preserve their right to adopt any breed of dog they choose,” according to Andy Briscoe, Director of State Legislation, Central Region, for the ASPCA.  Hooray for the citizens of Springfield, Missouri!  (“Springfield, MO, Overwhelmingly Repeals Pit Bull Ban,” ASPCA Action, Issue  3, 2018, p.6)

Posted on Monday, January 21st, 2019. Filed under Senior Law News.

How to Navigate Life as a “Solo Senior”

By Emily Martin, Esq.

Most of us assume that our children or other family members will help take care of us when we get older. Many seniors rely on their spouse or children to help manage their finances, monitor their health, and perform everyday tasks that they are no longer able to perform themselves. However, for some seniors, this is not an option. In fact, almost 22% of seniors are “solo seniors” – those age 55 or over who are unmarried and do not have children living nearby.[1]

For this group, navigating the unique struggles of life as a senior citizen can be very difficult – especially if they do not have a plan in place.  If you feel that you may become a “solo senior,” there are steps that you should take now to prepare for what could happen if you are unable to care for yourself.

Reconsider Your Living Situation

According to a recent survey, more than half of “solo seniors” have no one to call if they are confined to bed or if they need someone to drive them home from a medical procedure. If this is a concern for you, you may want to consider changing your living situation. If you live alone in a house in the suburbs and you fall in the bedroom, for example, it could be hours or even days before someone discovers that you are in distress. However, if you live in a senior apartment or independent living community, you will be a part of a larger group of people who are also in your situation and who will be more likely to check in on each other.

Even if you decide to stay at home, it is important for you to build a network of people who will look out for you in the event that something happens. Whether you become better acquainted with your neighbors, get to know friends from church or a social club, or even hire a geriatric care manager to see to your needs, it is vital that you have a community around you who will be able to recognize that you need help and provide the help that is needed when the time comes.

Put a Strong Estate Plan in Place

Everyone over the age of eighteen needs (at a minimum) an advance medical directive and financial power of attorney. However, for “solo seniors,” this need is even more critical. An advance medical directive allows you to appoint someone who has the authority to make medical decisions for you and outlines your wishes for end-of-life care. A financial power of attorney allows you to appoint someone to manage your finances for you if you are unable to manage them on your own. Without these documents in place, if you become incapacitated, it may be necessary for someone to petition a court to become your guardian and conservator, so they can make these decisions for you – and that person might not be who you would have wanted making those decisions.

If you are a “solo senior,” you may be wondering who you can name on these documents. It is true that most clients name spouses or children, but other options include siblings, nieces and nephews, family friends, and even financial advisors and attorneys.  

Another decision to make is who will inherit your assets upon your death. Many “solo seniors” may consider leaving money to charities or nonprofit organizations. If this is the case, there may be special planning to be done and various documents to be taken into consideration. It is always a good idea to seek the advice of an experienced estate planning attorney when having these documents prepared.

There are many difficult decisions that seniors must make, and for “solo seniors,” these decisions can be even more challenging. It is important to make sure you have a plan now, so that when the time comes, you can enjoy your senior years rather than worrying about who will take care of you if something should happen. Building a network of friends, family, and trusted professionals such as financial advisors, elder law and estate planning attorneys, and geriatric care managers can help you transition smoothly into life as a “solo senior.”


[1] All statistics in this article are from the following source: Elizabeth O’Brien, A Solo Senior’s Guide to Happiness, Money Magazine, November 2018, at 53.

Ask Kit Kat: Bongos at Norfolk, VA Zoo

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about the newborn bongos at the Virginia Zoo in Norfolk?

Kit Kat: Well, until I had read the article about them, I was not really sure what bongos are. Bongos are critically endangered animals from eastern, western, and central Africa. They belong to the antelope species, but they have whitish stripes on their side and long, spiraled horns. In short, they are magnificent creatures. Norfolk is fortunate to have them. Bongos are herbivores, and as adults measure around 5 feet tall. They are endangered in their native habitat due to poaching, habitat destruction, and diseases common to livestock.

Two calves were born on Dec. 26, 2018 to two different mothers. Johnny was born to 12-year old Juni and Bob. Johnny is about 2 feet tall, and his weight is about 44 pounds. Later in the day, mother Jesi (a 3-year old) went into labor, but after having problems, was delivered  of her calf through cesarean section. Her calf is a female named Charlie. Charlie also is 2 feet tall, but her weight is about 48 pounds. Charlie has been bottle-fed, since Jesi is still recovering from her surgery. Charlie appears to be thriving with this mother-substitute.

The number of bongos in the Virginia Zoo’s Okavango Delta exhibit is now 8. Baxter was born in March 2018, and a female named Joy was born Dec.25, 2017. The zoo said no visitors will be allowed to see the newborn calves until they are bigger and stronger. They will keep the public updated as to the calves’ progress via Facebook. (Katherine Hafner, “Virginia Zoo gets a pair of bongos for Christmas,” The Virginian-Pilot, January 3, 2019, pg.3)

Posted on Friday, January 11th, 2019. Filed under Senior Law News.

Reminder to Follow My Own Advice

By Letha Sgritta McDowell, CELA

While discussing estate planning with clients, we often stick to the theoretical and the reason behind having certain legal documents in place; many times the clients focus on the documents themselves. However, attorneys are referred to as “attorneys and counselors at law” which means a portion of our practice is to counsel clients on best practices.  In particular, elder and special needs law often deals with client’s healthcare concerns and practices to ensure quality healthcare and different methods to advocate advocacy.  Often I have encouraged clients and their loved ones to be sure they take a second person with them to any doctor’s appointments or consultations to listen to the advice provided by the physician and to take notes about care and treatment options and to ask questions.  Recently, I failed to take my own advice and have since learned my lesson.

My spouse had seen a number of physicians over the last year about consistent pain he was having.  His condition remained undiagnosed, until we recently visited a friend in the medical field who provided her diagnosis and advised seeking a surgical consult.  Thanks to a family member in the medical field, an appointment was made for the consultation with a reputable surgeon.  Unfortunately, I wasn’t advised of the consultation, nor was I able to rearrange my schedule to attend the meeting.  However, because my spouse is young and presumably capable of processing and relaying information, I didn’t believe that my presence was necessary.

The day of the surgery arrived and, at check-in, the receptionist mentioned something about “open.”  That was when I began to mildly panic.  A nurse came to take my spouse back to pre-op, and I stood to come back with him. I had questions I wanted to ask, given what I just heard.  The nurse said she would come get me in a few minutes.  More than a few minutes went by and, by the time she came to get me, my spouse was in a hospital gown with a needle in his arm and anesthesia had been administered.  I was terrified and furious all at the same time, since I had absolutely no idea what was happening.  All I knew at that point was the situation was not what I expected.  Of course, neither the surgeon nor the anesthesiologist were around to answer any questions.  A nurse was able to read my spouse’s chart to tell me what type of surgery was scheduled, and it was vastly different than what I had been told, and much different than what I had been expecting.  It was far more serious than what had been relayed to me, and the recovery was very different than simply not lifting objects. 

After the surgical consultation, my spouse reported that the surgeon had availability on December 18th.  He reported that he wouldn’t be able to lift anything for a few weeks and would be sore for a few days, but that was all.  So, while I was aware of an upcoming surgery, my impression was that the impact would be minimal.  At a holiday party the week before the surgery, my spouse told another party goer that his surgery was going to be laparoscopic; even better I thought to myself – very little down time!

At this point, the nurse looked to me to confirm I would be with him for the next 24 hours, as he was not to be left alone due to the anesthesia.  I let the nurse know I was not going to be with him, since I had a full day of appointments the following day, and that no one had informed me he needed to be watched.  The nurse gave me a look that said I must really be out in left field not to be aware of this fact, but I really had no idea. Finally, the surgeon arrived and confirmed he was having the more serious surgery and informed me that my spouse would be unable to walk up and down stairs for days (we live on the second floor) and he would not be able to drive for two to three weeks (I had scheduled him to pick up a few last minute Christmas gifts), and would likely not be able to work at all for a minimum of six weeks.  At this point, my panic turned from mild to major, and I was furious.  It was also too late to do anything about this, since he had already been administered anesthesia.

During my spouse’s operation, my mind flip flopped between calculating what had just been added to my already miles long to-do list (this was just a few days before Christmas and guests were set to arrive shortly), concern over the possible side effects of the operation, anger with my spouse for not informing me of how disabled he was going to be for weeks, and frustration with myself for not following the advice I had been providing to clients for years.

My spouse’s surgery turned out to be fine, although we won’t know if it was successful until sometime in mid-January.  He can walk up and down steps now, but he still can’t drive.  We did make sure our son had a nice Christmas. And, I learned a valuable lesson– I was reminded to take my own advice. In hindsight, I should have made my spouse change the consultation to be at a time when I could have gone with him.  At a minimum, I should have sent my HIPAA waiver to the surgeon and spoken with him prior to the moment of surgery.

Estate planning and planning for medical events are not simply for older adults or people with disabilities; medical procedures happen to young people as well.  Remember, if you find yourself or someone close to you in need of any medical attention, take someone else to the pre-surgery appointment, and make sure all parties understand what the medical procedure will involve  post-surgery.

Ask Kit Kat – City v. Country Frogs

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, is it true there is a difference between croaking or singing of urban frogs v. country frogs?

Kit Kat: Well, oddly enough, there does appear to be a difference. Scientists first observed the difference in tungara frogs in Panama. In cities in Panama, the tungara male frog took advantage of the lack of predators like bats and snakes, and their mating calls were low-pitched, and had a beeping, more rapid quality to it. Apparently, this is more enticing to female frogs coming from both urban and rural venues. Scientists reported this phenomenon in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution. When 40 female frogs originating from both types of locales were played both kinds of mating calls in a laboratory, 30 of them hopped over to the speaker playing the urban frogs’ songs.

All is not so easy for the urban male frog however. Although his call is extremely enticing, there are fewer female frogs in the city. So he has to work harder to attract a mate. Who knew the life of a male frog could be so complicated? The urban-rural divide applies not only to humans, but to frogs as well! (Christina Larson, “City frogs are sexier than country cousins,” The Virginian-Pilot, December 12, 2018, p.4)

Posted on Monday, January 7th, 2019. Filed under Senior Law News.

Tips For Paying Off That Holiday Debt

By Jennifer Rossettini, CFP®

Shoppers in the U.S., on average, incurred $1,054 in debt over the 2017 holiday season. If those shoppers chose to pay only the minimum payment of $25, they would still be paying off that debt (until 2023) and, at the average interest rate of 15.9%, would end up paying a total of $500 extra in interest. If you find yourself with unwanted debt once the 2018 holiday season winds down, you may be wondering what to do about it.

The first step is to take an inventory of your debt. For each credit card used, write down the outstanding balance and the interest rate. Once you are armed with that information, you can decide where you want to begin. Logic often tells us to pay off the highest interest rate cards and/or largest balances first, and that is often the best course of action. However, there are some reasons you may want to start with the lowest interest rate cards. For example, those retailers that get you to buy big ticket items with the promise of 0% interest during a promotional period often have a catch: they defer the interest, and if you do not pay off every cent of that purchase before the end of the promotional period, the retailer will add all of the interest that would have accrued onto your balance. Another reason for paying off smaller balances first is that it motivates you to continue onto the next one.

 Other than deciding which debts to pay off first, one needs to determine where the extra outflow will fit into their budget. One consideration is to look for ways to generate more cash. For example, if your credit card offers a rewards program, you can often use cash back rewards to pay down the balance or even trade frequent flier miles for cash. Jean Chatzky also suggests selling your unused electronics, reselling unused gift cards, checking for unclaimed money, cashing in on insurance policy dividends and rewards, and taking advantage of shopping portals and cash back applications.[1]

Another consideration is to look for ways to reduce other expenses in order to free up some extra cash to pay off those debts. For example, packing lunch instead of buying lunch every day could save you $50 per week or $200 per month. Try not to add to the debt during this pay back period. Avoid using your credit card to make up a budget shortfall and instead use “envelope budgeting”: set aside actual cash to pay for certain variable budget items, such as eating out, entertainment, transportation, etc., and when that cash is gone, spending on that item ends for the month.

Of course, the best way to avoid a similar problem next year is, once this year’s debt is paid off, take advantage of the above budgeting techniques and save that extra cash for next year’s holiday spending.


[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/better/business/how-pay-holiday-debt-faster-ncna836256

Ask Kit Kat – Loyal Dog in CA

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell about Madison, the  Anatolian shepherd dog, who reunited with his 75-year-old owner after the California Camp Fire?

Kit Kat: Both are Anatolian shepherds, large dogs with thick fur, who need a lot of space. She says, “These dogs are livestock guardian dogs, they do not do well in heat, they do not do well in small enclosures. They protect their property.” Temporarily, she and her husband are living in a mobile home park, so the dogs are staying at their home site alone, with Gaylord bringing them their food on a daily basis.

According to Marlene Johnson, who owns Anatolian shepherds and founded a Facebook group called Livestock Guardian Dogs and Positive Training Methods, “Madison is a perfect example of a livestock guardian dog. He braved a natural disaster and went right back to where he belonged and stayed there until his owners and working buddy returned.” How he survived the fire is a mystery, but one of the rescue workers hypothesizes that he somehow managed to outrun the fire, and then circled back to his home area. Quite a dog, wouldn’t you say? (Hilary Hanson, “Loyal Dog Found Guarding Home Weeks After Wildfire Burned It to the Ground,” Huffington Post, Dec. 10, 2018)

Upcoming Seminars

Posted on Monday, December 31st, 2018. Filed under Senior Law News.

No! You Cannot Disinherit Your Spouse.

By Shannon Laymon-Pecoraro, Esq.

Many clients come to our office and want to limit an inheritance to, or completely disinherit, a spouse, due to a number of reasons.  It could be that they want to ensure their children are provided for after their death, or that the spouse does not want to disrupt eligibility for public benefits. Regardless of the reason, the law clearly outlines rights your spouse has to your estate. As a result, with few legal defenses, such as abandonment,agreement or murder, you cannot completely disinherit your spouse.

Under the current law, a spouse is entitled to a percentage of your estate based on the length of the marriage,with the maximum percentage vesting after fifteen years of marriage. The elective share calculation is based off the decedent’s augmented estate, which takes into account not only the assets in the probate estate, but accounts for such things as the value of assets in the spouse’s personal estate, assets received by the spouse outside of the estate (for example, a fifty percent interest in a house that was held jointly), and the value of assets received by others before and after death. Historically, the value of the elective share was required to pass outright to the spouse, but, under current law, you can satisfy this claim by having such share pass to a marital trust, and if the spouse is incapacitated, to a special needs trust.

In addition to the claim for an elective share, a spouse may have other claims and allowances. The spouse may claim a family allowance, which may be paid as a lump sum not to exceed $24,000 or in periodic installments not to exceed $2,000 per month for one year.  There may also be a claim for exempt property and a homestead allowance, each valued at $20,000.

Because various factors and deadlines apply to the various items addressed herein, you should not attempt to file these claims on your own. In some circumstances, if you claim an elective share in lieu of the gift provided to you under a Will, you may receive less than was originally provided to you. Similarly, planning around the elective share can be complicated and a failure to seek qualified legal advice could result in an unintended expensive legal process. Many experienced estate planners will be able to help navigate these issues and recommend alternative solutions. 

Kit Kat

Ask Kit Kat – Talking Blue Jay

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about the blue jay at the Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center in Virginia Beach who meows like a cat?

Kit Kat: Well, it’s a male and his name is Chi. As a hatchling, he was raised by an elderly woman who mistook him for a cockatoo. There were several cats in the household, and he picked upon their meowing. After a while, the woman was no longer able to care for her pets, so she asked a wildlife rehabilitator to find the jay a home. The rehabilitator realized immediately that this was a wild bird who had been raised in captivity and would not make a good candidate to be released outdoors permanently. So Chi was offered a home at the Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center. He lives in the Upland River room near the front entrance of the main building, along with some turtles, fish, ducks, and other birds native to the area.  He’s been there since 2009.Chi is estimated to be about 16 years old.

Chi is extremely social. He has a girlfriend—another blue jay—whose name is Nigel. He and Nigel happily greet visitors and munch on seeds and meal worms, staples of their diet. Not only can Chi make cat-like meows, but he can sing half a musical scale, as well as make a catcall sound—when he sees someone he deems attractive. He’s quite a character! (Stacy Parker, “Kitty twitter—Blue Jay at Virginia Aquarium, raised as a pet, meows like a cat,” The Virginian-Pilot, Nov. 22, 2018, p.1 & 4)

Upcoming Seminars

Distribution of This Newsletter

Hook Law Center encourages you to share this newsletter with anyone who is interested in issues pertaining to the elderly, the disabled and their advocates. The information in this newsletter may be copied and distributed, without charge and without permission, but with appropriate citation to Hook Law Center, P.C. If you are interested in a free subscription to the Hook Law Center News, then please telephone us at 757-399-7506, e-mail us at mail@hooklawcenter.com or fax us at 757-397-1267.

Posted on Thursday, December 13th, 2018. Filed under Senior Law News.

Don’t Become a Victim of the “Grandparent Scam”

By Emily Martin, Esq.

What is the “grandparent scam” and how does it work?

Unfortunately, seniors are often the targets of scams looking to cheat them out of their money – often to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. Although it has been around for years, in recent months, there has been a resurgence in the number of seniors falling victim to the “grandparent scam.”

Typically, the “grandparent scam” works like this: you get a call from someone pretending to be your grandchild. This person explains that she is in trouble and needs money immediately. Perhaps she is in jail and needs money for bond or is stuck in a foreign country in needs money to get out. Typically the caller will include enough detail to make the story seem realistic. The “grandchild” will often ask you not to tell your child (their parent) that they are in trouble. They ask you to wire money to a specific location or to give it to a third party, who is usually someone posing as a lawyer or police officer. Once you wire the money, the scammers break off all contact – usually making it impossible to recover your losses.

There are many ways these scammers choose their targets. They may purchase “lead lists” with information about older people or people they can get lots of personal information about. Often, scammers peruse social media to find information about potential targets, such as whether they have grandchildren or how old they may be.

How to handle the scam it if happens to you

The first and most important step to take is not to panic if you get this type of call. Often the scammers call in the middle of the night, when you may not be thinking clearly and may be more likely to believe what you hear. Always verify the person’s identity by asking questions someone else could not answer – such as the name of their first pet. Call other family members to see if they have heard from your grandchild – or even try to call your grandchild’s personal telephone to see if they are okay. In no circumstances should you send money until you are absolutely positive that your grandchild is in trouble and that the money is going to the correct party.

If you realize you have been scammed after you have sent money but before it has been picked up, you may be able to retrieve it. Unfortunately, if the money has already been picked up, it is most likely gone for good – along with the scammers who took it.

How to protect yourself from being targeted by scammers

In order to prevent your email and computer from being hacked, use a firewall and anti-virus/anti-spyware software. Don’t open email attachments from strangers or even from friends and family when the attachment seems strange.

Make sure all of your social media accounts are private, so that scammers cannot see your personal information. And if you receive a telephone call from a number you don’t recognize, it may be best to screen the call until you determine it is legitimate.

 

Kit KatAsk Kit Kat – What Can Horses See?

Hook Law Center: Kit Kat, what can you tell us about how horses see color and distance as compared with humans?

Kit Kat: Well, this is extremely interesting. Some new information is coming out of Britain. Research at the University of Exeter indicates that horses neither perceive color nor distance in the same way that humans do. Obviously, improving our understanding could not only make it safer for the horses, but for humans, too, who are riding or jumping on these majestic animals.

To examine how horses actually see, researchers at the University of Exeter did some research. What they found is that horses cannot tell the difference between reds, like true red and orange, and green. Therefore, the ubiquitous use of orange on crossbars and take-off boards for fences and hurdles is probably not very helpful for the horse. They see orange as green, so to use it as a marker is absolutely no help at all. Humans have three types of cone cells in their eyes, while horses only have two.

Also, according to other scientists such as Janel L. Jones, who has a Pd.D. in cognitive science and wrote an article in Equus magazine, horses cannot see items from as far away as humans do. What a human can see at 30 feet from an object, a horse can only see that same object when at a distance of 20 feet. With the speed at which horses are travelling, that could make a significant difference. Poor color perception combined with poor depth perception could be responsible for some of the accidents which occur at a track.

With this new information in hand, the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) will begin experimenting with different colors in some of their training locations and gathering input from trainers and riders. Already the use of white and yellow for fences and jumps has yielded improved data for the way the horses jumped. “If it’s clear that horses are confident, respectful of the fence and jumping cleaner and better, then the authority will look at rolling it out to a number of racetracks.” Traditional orange marking may be a thing of the past! Stay tuned.  (Bianca Britton, “New research on horse eyesight could improve racecourse safety,” www.CNN.com, October 23, 2018)

Upcoming Seminars

Distribution of This Newsletter

Hook Law Center encourages you to share this newsletter with anyone who is interested in issues pertaining to the elderly, the disabled and their advocates. The information in this newsletter may be copied and distributed, without charge and without permission, but with appropriate citation to Hook Law Center, P.C. If you are interested in a free subscription to the Hook Law Center News, then please telephone us at 757-399-7506, e-mail us at mail@hooklawcenter.com or fax us at 757-397-1267.

Posted on Monday, December 10th, 2018. Filed under Senior Law News.
Like us on Facebook
Planning Guides

Sign up for our email newsletter and get access to our free planning reports.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Ask Kit Kat: Pet advice and wisdom as Kit Kat sees it.

ASK ME